Archive for May, 2007

h1

Wi-Fry?

May 24, 2007

The BBC recently aired a Panorama programme about the possible health implications of wi-fi. Investigations into the way that health affects people are nothing new. But ones like this often go unfounded and still don’t prove or disprove anything.
They didn’t seem to really conclude whether mobile phones do cause health problems. I personally don’t think that they do. I guess it hasn’t been proven that they do, otherwise they wouldn’t be given planning permission to install mobile phone masts. I think people had issues with mobile phone transmitters also because the transmitters don’t make an area look nice. Similarly, the wi-fi ones in Norwich don’t look very nice. I think it’s a NIMBY attitude, people want the service, but they don’t want the eyesores on their landscapes or the possible health risks.

I think at this stage it’s difficult to examine the long term health issues of relatively new technology. The BBC should present arguments with a balanced perspective – at least to some degree to show the views of both sides. It’s one of their objectives to represent fair and balanced journalism.

However, after watching the programme, I think it was presented a little unfairly, especially for the BBC, with more against wi-fi than for it. Someone that was for wi-fi was discredited wrongfully for working with mobile phone companies. What matters is that he did the study, not who for. When it comes to safety, I’m sure most companies want to ensure that they’re not hurting people.

The uncertainty in the programme was immense. Unsurprising since they’re attempting to contest a technology in its relative infancy. These things are incedibly hard to prove/disprove but the programme was clearly representing wi-fi as a danger to children. Something that obviously will make parents concerned, will boost their ratings. A lot of the program was opinionated with little facts to support their claims. They also compared the wi-fi router and mobile phone mast unfairly. The mast was 100 metres away whilst they were virtually next to the router. It was obviously going to look higher unless they’d stood next to the mast to create a fair test. How could he have been that surprised? A woman who was claiming to be “electro-sensitive” decorated her room with foil. This was supposedly to repel the microwave energy from mobile phone and wi-fi signals that made her feel ill. I couldn’t help laughing at the situation. And the one with the ceiling painted black – that is another method to prevent the microwave energy affecting another woman suffering. That must be nice to look at when you get home. I do feel a little guilty about laughing if they are actually electrosensitive, but who’s to say whether it is the radio signals that’s affecting them? Maybe they’re sensitive to something else.

h1

Tech Justice?

May 19, 2007

The digital world allows information and data to be sent around the world in a matter of seconds. Therefore allowing wild rumours to spread around the globe in considerably less time than ever before. News gets changed in the process, with such variations affecting the source of the material. Similarly, multimedia content can be sent around the net with ease via P2P networks, something that is illegal yet seems to have few criminals being notably punished. Claims of it being too hard to find people comitting the crimes aren’t completely unfounded, as the number of people doing so has increased dramatically. It seems that those who want to watch stateside TV and movies before they can even be transmitted in the UK aren’t too fussed about being caught.
I don’t think it would be that hard to find those downloading such illicit content. Especially when downloading feature length movies and HD content, the amount being downloaded should surely make them stick out from the crowd of people browsing the web and checking their inbox. Nevertheless, they continue to get away with it, most likely because it is simply too much of a fuss for the feds to do anything about what is almost a non-issue. Campaigns relating it to drugs and terrorism are all well and good, but it’s not really stopping anyone from downloading is it? When I see these ads on the beginning on films both in the cinema and on DVDs, I always wonder why they’re targetting people who have just bought the product legally.
Instead, it is the honest consumers who are made to pay. Increased prices for DVDs and cinema tickets are just two examples of how the entertainment industry strives to retain their wealth. Recently, the AACS encryption key was revealed to the world via thousands of diggs. Initially Diig revolted and prevented them from being displayed, but this example just goes to prove the power of the people when they have the Internet as their tool of choice. Digg soon allowed the diggs of the story to continue, therefore allowing anyone with enough competence to be able to decode and copy HD content.


I decided to blog about this as I’ve just read “Chan Nai-ming got three months in jail, a month each for Daredevil, Miss Congeniality and Red Planet”. This man, from Hong Kong, is the first to be imprisoned for online piracy. Something which shocked me. I knew that it was difficult to target those responsible, as servers are located where there aren’t applicable laws and the sheer number of people involved. But to be the first? That’s quite an achievement considering the amount of time that video downloading has been possible.
The reason I think that makes it almost impossible to get a successful conviction of felons in this field is the state of current law and the judicial system in general. When handling a case in regards to aledged online terrosm accusations, Judge Peter Openshaw said: “The trouble is I don’t understand the language. I don’t really understand what a Web site is.” That left me almost dumbfounded. A judge overseeing a case about events that have taken place online, something which he has little knowledge or experience of is quite frankly ridiculous. OK, I’m not saying that he should know everything, but you’d have at least thought that he’d have been briefed about the case.
The laws that are there to protect content were written years before the Internet developed, making cases against piracy online much harder to deal with than it was when someone stole a CD from Virgin Megastore. It seems that only the USA has laws that make it clearer when dealing with digital legal issues (the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) whereas the rest of the world becomes mixed up in endless legal proceedings without concrete legislative backup. Pandora, the online radio station that allows users to customise it to their needs has had to close it’s doors to anyone outside the US, whilst mine still works in the UK it won’t in other countries. That old post code trick will be reinforced with checking a users location via IP address. The DMCA clears the US for use of this, whilst other online  radio stations are ceasing broadcasting as licencing laws changed that would mean that more money would have to be paid per every song played.
The Internet was supposed to make exchanging data and information across the world so much easier. And it has. But the legal issues are still very unclear and very complex. Without a universal law that would apply to anyone in the world. Cases like this will go on as whilst the information is available, it isn’t all strictly legal anywhere in the world.
Chris Chapman
[ Read - Judge Baffled by Internet in Internet Court Case]
[Read - Bit Torrent Pirate lands in Clink]

h1

Rumour Mill: XBOX 360 not getting blu-ray

May 17, 2007

Ah well, it wasn’t that likely anyway was it. Microsoft, a major backer of the HD-DVD camp, isn’t adding a blu-ray external drive to the 360 as I reported recently here. Microsoft themselves (or at least the XBOX employees) have dismissed the idle speculation floating round the net from an aleged quote from Peter Moore (vice president for marketing and publishing for Xbox). Whilst it would be cool for the 360 to get blu-ray (making it the most universal games console available), it looks like chances of it actually happening are limited. That is unless blu-ray does happen to win the format war. Back to the deadlock then of accepting that we’re stuck with two formats. You could always look toward a player that’ll handle anything that you’ll chuck at it like the BH100 or just stick to upscaling your DVDs. You didn’t really wanna watch blu-ray movies with the noise of the 360 did you?
Chris Chapman
[Clearing the Air: In Support of HD DVD...]
[Rumour Mill: Xbox blu-ray add-on]

h1

Virgin "Broadband"

May 16, 2007

Virgin Media recently applied “traffic management” to all broadband services to try to prevent heavy usage of the service by some users. So between 4pm and midnight the below restrictions are put in place:

“Broadband Size: M – 2mb
During peak times, the top 5% on the Size: M package download at least 350MB of traffic each.
Any users hitting this amount during peak times (4pm till midnight) will have their broadband speed temporarily traffic managed – their download speed will be set to 1Mb, with their upload speed set to 128Kb. This will last for 4 hours from when the traffic management policy is applied.
Broadband Size: L (4mb)
During peak times, the top 5% on the Size: L package download at least 750MB of traffic each.
Any users hitting this amount during peak times (4pm till midnight) will have their broadband speed temporarily traffic managed – their download speed will be set to 2Mb, with their upload speed set to 192Kb. This will last for 4 hours from when the traffic management policy is applied.
Broadband Size: XL (20mb – old 10mb)
During peak times, the top 5% on the Size: XL package download at least 3GB of traffic each.
Any users hitting this amount during peak times (4pm till midnight) will have their broadband speed temporarily traffic managed – their download speed will be set to 5Mb, with their upload speed set to 256Kb. This will last for 4 hours from when the traffic management policy is applied.”

This isn’t fair at all. They’re supposed to provide a “service” that people pay for. Customers have come to expect broadband speeds. I don’t consider myself to download a lot, just a little web browsing and watching a few vidcasts and videos on YouTube. The latter is made a painstaking process between those hours now. For the past couple of weeks I’ve tried to watch the Stuff vidcast and it constantly buffers or stalls after just a few seconds. YouTube videos are also slow or don’t stream at all. The speed is even less than those claimed reduced amounts, being measured in as little as 66kbps when I checked the speed via internetfrog. I’m guessing that this is because they’re trialing their 50mbps service, but increasing the speed of some users to 20mbps seems pointless if it’s going to be limited. I suppose it’s better than having download caps, but that could prove to be the next step.

h1

Apple Report Delay for iPhone and Leopard?

May 16, 2007

Apple fanboys from around the world have recently had a little shock (approx equivalent to 10,000 volts), as Engadget just posted a rumoured internal email in Apple HQ about the iPhone and Leopard being further delayed. This was later revoked and revealed that it was a spoof.
Interesting enough in itself, but the event caused stocks for Apple to momentarily drop by 3%; surely going to show what stockholders do beside look at their stock levels. I personally don’t blame Engadget at all, they reported what was supposed to be a leaked email from a credible source, they’ve corrected their mistake and the stocks have returned to their previous value.
Could this be a marketing stunt from Apple, or merely proving that Apple have done the “impossible” and had security issues. If the former, it obviously worked as now the world’s bloggers are reporting the threat. Could there still be some truth in this despite Apple’s response or merely a way to generate interest for the iPhone’s launch in America next month. I personally think this is more a marketing strategy to gain, even more, attention for the soon to be ubiquitous iPhone. Words of worry from Apple fanboys, jibes from anti-Apple readers and people looking for sources to the claims soon appeared on the popular blog.
Apple definitely seems to be changing it’s policy of not announcing products until they’re ready to launch. But this new approach of announcing then constant delays, seems to be highlighting that Apple has just as many problems about getting their products to market as their main rival, Microsoft. Already delaying Leopard (to maximise resources for the iPhone release), they’re now finding their own problems even after the comments about the Microsoft Vista delayed launch.
[Read]
by: Chris Chapman

h1

Rumour Mill: Xbox blu-ray add-on

May 15, 2007

The vice president for marketing and publishing for Xbox (Peter Moore) recently said in an interview that there will be a blu-ray add-on for the 360 by Christmas. However, this interview was given in Japan, where the PS3 is doing pretty well for itself, leading me to believe this could be fighting talk from Microsoft with little substance.
Microsoft have always backed HD-DVD in the format war and with Sony being the main founding company for blu-ray, would Microsoft really make a blu-ray add on for the 360? Maybe, but more likely no. It’s probably simply talk that aims to get more 360s sold with an empty promise of a console (albeit a noisy one) that could handle both disc formats.
However, if the rumours are true, then we could be seeing the 360 becoming the best console, offering people the ability to play movies on either format. Plus, Microsoft has IPTV for the 360 already in the US, the addition of such an add-on would make it a decent all-rounder for home entertainment. Does this imply that Microsoft are finally buckling under the success of blu-ray so far?
Chris Chapman
[via Gizmodo]

h1

Video: iCat

May 14, 2007

We’ve all seen those funny home movies of babies laughing and animals doing the craziest things but this one’s funny and sweet. Does this mean that it likes Macbooks or not? The cats name is Robot and apparently didn’t scratch the Macbook at all, as it doesn’t play with it’s claws.

[Direct Link]

h1

This is Ink

May 8, 2007

Printer ink is, I think, the second most expensive liquid in the world, yeah right up there with champagne. So it couldn’t really get any more expensive could it? Well it could, and it’s going to. You see, ink cartridges up until now were classified as printer parts, so being exempt from extra tax as they were an essential item to make the printer, well print. However, the cartridges merely serve the ink, and according to the judge they just have to be taxed – taking the average cost of ink cartridges to somewhere nearer the £50 per 30ml price point?
[Read]
Chris Chapman

h1

Video: PC Fun

May 8, 2007

Ever wondered what you could do with 86 old tower PCs? Well here’s just one thing, right before you recylce them of course.